Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 00:52

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All international travelers should get measles vaccinations, CDC says - AP News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why Adding More Bananas to Your Diet Could Impact Your Blood Pressure - Prevention
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
When did Elon Musk fall from grace?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
McDonald's is facing a harsh new reality as customer behavior shifts - TheStreet
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?